There's no set rule, at least in more recent PTs. For example, in PT 81, the second passage was hardest, and the first passage was probably the second hardest.
Hey, @"vanessa fisher" How about sharing your techniques? I had this problem on the June LSAT. I had an experimental games section that was killer, and it affected by motivation and confidence for the rest of the test.
I think that in light of the more recent PTs, JY would probably not have said a lot of the comments he says about the miscellaneous games not really being so relevant.
You can never ever conclude causation from correlation, but correlation does make causation more likely. Therefore, additional correlation can strengthen an argument.
Have you checked out LSAT Trainer on this type of question? I really like what he writes.
Also, if you quickly scan the last question of a game set and see that there is a rule substitution question, you can try and be mindful of what the rule doe…
You can look at interviews with admission deans from various law schools, and very few say that they completely ignore multiple scores. Yes, the highest score is given by far the most weight, but it is not true that lower scores are viewed as non-ex…
To me, the question is: What do you gain by taking in September. You have clearly not reached close to your potential, so why put a lower-than-ideal score on your record. It is not true that a lower score is completely disregarded. Someone with a 17…
@ZaTabler said:
@uhinberg Hell as much prep as I've done I don't care if I piss myself on test day as long as I get a good score.
Those sitting around you might care, though.
@ZaTabler said:
@elle_sat said:
@ZaTabler said:
I slammed a 20oz red bull as I was walking in test day and the proctor stood there like....
Hahha! And how did that work out for you? Did you …
Coffee is getting a bad rap over here. So, just to even the playing field, this: http://www.healthline.com/nutrition/top-13-evidence-based-health-benefits-of-coffee#section12
I think that the language, "a known factor in heart disease and stroke" means that it contributes toward it. I think if it prevented heart disease and stroke, it would have said, "a known factor in preventing heart disease and stroke." I don't think…
Just watched J.Y. take PT 81. He got two wrong on one LR section, which would have given him a 178. Anyone can make a mistake or two from time to time.
What about a couple of RC tutoring sessions. Maybe that can shave off some points from the section that (aside from the outlier of PT 81) is giving you by far the most trouble.