Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
OlamHafuch
About
- Username
- OlamHafuch
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,162
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Not really, as far as I can tell.
-
No, the order does not have to match.
-
2018
-
I sympathize with your plight, but it seems to me that there might be a "patience" issue here. You have posted several times in the past few weeks about your RC struggles, and from the continued frustration, it appears to me that you'd like to see m…
-
There are times, however, when a MBT question reveals a key inference to the game, that allows you to answer all other questions more efficiently. The game with NY and Washington being 2 apart comes to mind. Had @J.Y. Ping not done the answers to t…
-
Just as an aside, why do LSAT writers seem to have such a penchant for dinosaurs, neanderthals, and meteorites?
-
Yes, such placement of "only" is well-accepted in modern English usage (when the meaning is clear), but technically, "only" should be placed before the thing it is modifying. See Bryan Garner's Modern English Usage. For example, you can get away wit…
-
@Katherine I'm sure you'll get your 160+ if you keep plugging away.
-
I just want to commend @"Alex Divine" for his straight talk. Alex has distinguished himself on this forum as one of the nicest, most helpful people around, and he realizes that in some situations, tough talk, without any sugar-coating is the greates…
-
@goingfor99th said: Thanks, guys! It's good to have a bunch of different perspectives to consider. I think I'm going to opt out of the retake. I've already proven to myself that I can succeed at the highest level on the LSAT when I really…
-
I would suggest that perhaps the title to this thread should be changed. A 166 may not be the score you wanted, or the one you are capable of, but it is decidedly not a bad score. Many people would be absolutely elated with that score. Additionally,…
-
@"ralph.mercer" said: is there a chance some of us wont get our scores today? Anything's possible. I just wish I heard of someone who has gotten his score in the last little while.
-
@"nicole.burdakin" said: Maybe their server crashed? I wonder if they have staff working overnight tonight. That would be horrible. I wonder when we'd find out about that.
-
If you're willing to pay Manhattan Prep tutoring prices ($255/hr), why not consider @"Jonathan Wang" -- the King of LSAT.
-
@"Mitchell-1" said: @Zachary_P said: Does anyone know the latest they would send out scores? This is brutal. At this point you are at the mercy of a server running a script. Mass email and database updates are an unfortunat…
-
On TLS people have reported their scores. And anyway, it would be impossible to know the curve unless someone got their scores.
-
People are reporting scores on other sites.
-
Just went gray, guys!
-
@tylerdschreur10 Maybe you should drink a shot for every time you refresh LSAC's website.
-
Hey @Kewlaidd ! Have you been checking out D. Killoran's tweets today. I know you love them.
-
When LSAC knows what the release date is going to be, why don't they send out an e-mail with the updated date? Does that make too much sense for their liking? The amount of lost productivity due to people not knowing when grey day will be is mind-bo…
-
Hey, maybe JY should start a 7Sage course for 1L.
-
Personally, I found that the LR and RC sections have gotten harder. As others have mentioned, the wrong answer choices appear to have gotten more enticing. Also, I think that stimuli have become more involved and convoluted. [There have been changes…
-
TLS has a poll on this question. It seems like most people voted for somewhere between -9 (which would mean an easier than average test) and -11(which would mean a pretty average test).
-
Hard to argue with a Sage, but I am a bit surprised about @"Cant Get Right" 's attitude toward checking to passage to confirm answers. If you have a good idea about the structure of a passage and where to find details, it's really not that hard to q…
-
Also, if you didn't get to a whole game and whole passage, that's a speed issue that should be resolved with more practice.
-
Looks like we can close up shop for today. Hopefully, tomorrow, but then there's that kinda plausible theory floating around that the new LSAC pres. had instituted a release on expected release day policy.
-
Good luck! It's an honor to serve the country, and the country is honored to be served by people who feel honored to serve it.
-
@imharris You're thinking of working for the Federal Government?
-
Fellow June LSAT waiters: Don't hold your breath for a July 4 release. Seems highly unlikely, though I hope I'm wrong.