Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
canihazJD
About
- Username
- canihazJD
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,040
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
@EbethStudent16 said: Can anyone point me to JY talking about timing or skipping strategies? https://classic.7sage.com/why-you-have-to-skip-questions-on-the-lsat/ https://classic.7sage.com/webinar/skip-it/
-
The material is slightly different in its presentation. To the point that some people experience score fluctuations transitioning into the 70s and again into the 80s. A lot of the Flex sections have been drawn off these eras. Also the 80s particula…
-
Alternate between the 80s and 70s
-
@kilgoretrout said: @canihazJD said: @kilgoretrout I just pitched PT70 to @"Noise Dogood" if we can all get on the same page I'm ok with either. Tagging them to see if we can work something out as I think a group BR would be good.…
-
Work on timing/skipping strategies, and do a comprehensive written review of anything that gave you trouble on the test. The deeper you get into actually articulating what you did vs what you should be doing, the better you will be able to recognize…
-
@kilgoretrout I just pitched PT70 to @"Noise Dogood" if we can all get on the same page I'm ok with either. Tagging them to see if we can work something out as I think a group BR would be good. If not, I'm down to do 65 towards the end of the week…
-
For Q3 the right AC will force all the remaining pieces into place. For Q4: how many game pieces can only go into two possible slots?
-
I think for these and any other question type, and really any part of the test, you have to just understand the argument being presented to you. All these "tricks" can work, and they're great tools to augment a solid grasp of what the stimulus is s…
-
@"ashley.tien" said: I know in your example, you set "up until this past year" as 3 years ago up until the past year, but is there a time limit to that? like can we go even further back? this nuance is a bit confusing I mean outside the argu…
-
@"ashley.tien" said: Oh, I misunderstood that. Hm, is it because of "up until" this past year? If it said "this past year," then would it match what I was saying in my earlier comments? For the past year until the present, the students' food v…
-
"...the only alternative to the current vendor is Hall Dining Services, which served as the university's food vendor up until this past year." 🌮Hall's tacos - -|- - 🌮Hall's tacos - -|- - 🍔JY's Burgers - -|- - - ??new year?? 3 years ago - - -- …
-
It means they had Hall until this past year began, then had a new one for the past year, which students want replaced. But the only alternative is to go back to Hall.
-
It's not that there couldn't be an earthquake off of a minor fault. It's that the criteria used for being least likely to be struck by an earthquake is that it is on a fault that has been hit already by an earthquake. It limits the argument to the …
-
@"ashley.tien" said: and it's odd that they wouldn't want the organ to go back to the way it was but the correct answer choice provides a potential reason why Yes, A tells you why despite being able to and everything else being restored to o…
-
I mean even if you took original to mean just before it got bombed.... like the condition on the day it got bombed. The fact that the organ was modified a few times before that doesn't matter either, since now we're just bringing it back to the way …
-
@"ashley.tien" said: so the original design is referring to the form the church had pre-bombing and the foundation's goal is to restore the church to what it originally looked like. That's what I read it as. Original - so like when they fin…
-
So why if we take extraordinary care to restore this church to its original form do we not restore the organ, despite having the funds to do so? D. By the time the church was destroyed the organ had been modified several times. Ok, so by the t…
-
Just get some time in on lawhub until you feel comfortable with the interface. Maybe use it for review. That and taking PTs here should be enough.
-
@swanganie said: I really do star every question where I can't say to myself that I hate 4 of the ACs or that I love one AC, might be excessive? I'd just add that I think a comprehensive read and elimination of 4 ACs isn't necessarily requir…
-
@frankbnakasako said: I also know someone who's a double-stem/philo major (Bio). I'm sure curious how they would score on it. Like, shouldn't it be general knowledge which majors give you an advantage on the LSAT? I'm suprised we don't have st…
-
@swanganie said: @canihazJD thanks for the responses. Do you have any advice on time spent on PT Blind Review vs in-depth review with correct answers? I ask because I notice I take an additional 8-12 hours just on BR, writing out my thoug…
-
I don't know that I'd include the part about the business as written. As it reads right now, that first part basically says "school wasn't as important to me." Also it's not something you had to "bounce back" from. It was a chosen shift of focus. …
-
Lawhub is the exact format, as it's where you'll be taking the test. There are a couple PTs in flex format on Lawhub, but the rest you can just do individual sections and score on your own. You won't have the capability to BR or get timing data ther…
-
If it was part of a PT its in the prep test section.
-
@mp41yfe1 said: Was reading the 75th and thought that was the median and had a brief panic attack. Thank you! I think I did the same thing for a second. I would have ordered it the other way.
-
@"ashley.tien" said: judge whether a policy is fair to all (judge on a subject) -----> seasoned politicians with political know-how (have knowledge on subject) Yes, that's the conclusion. When you ask weren't they all equivalent, I think…
-
@"ashley.tien" said: so the jump is from politicians having political know-how to being able to judge whether a policy is fair for all? (having knowledge on subject) yes. @"ashley.tien" said: Premises: Competent to pass judgment o…
-
This is a really good question. The error isn't in the conditional logic, but in the assumption. If you can judge then you have knowledge Political know how comes from apprenticeship and experience So only seasoned politicians can judge whether a…
-
Assume it does indicate the footprints were incomplete. T's argument is: They show human characteristics So they're hominid prints Does the fact that some details are missing from the print (note: which they would be anyway, no matter what) weak…
-
Everyone's different... some people get good outcomes just piling on PT after PT. I think that's kind of like brute forcing a score increase just by sheer volume of exposure... not nearly the most efficient. In my opinion,1 a week is the sweet spot…