Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
ddakjiking
About
- Username
- ddakjiking
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,213
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
I second @"Nilesh S" I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
-
@blah170blah Probably just SUfficient assumption lol
-
I think we just got confused with your following sentence "Makes sense, but sometimes the right answer to strengthen questions seem like a must be true." lol. It's been 2.5 weeks since looking at anything LSAT-related so maybe some of us are rusty.…
-
Yeah...the approach to MBT aren't even close to Strengthen. MBT/MSS/MBF are in their own family of questions.
-
Read the thread title and thought scores were out. Gave me a mini panic attack.
-
scores are usually released a few days before the published date. I'm expecting a 2/27-28ish release.
-
@emli1000 I hope so. lol.
-
T minus 6 or 7 more days. Who's getting anxious?
-
http://www.cambridgelsat.com/bundles/logical-reasoning-by-type/ This helped me out a lot. You're in a good spot though. It's pretty hard to do that well on RC lol.
-
How many are you missing per section? With a 168 on your last PT and assuming a near perfect LG section, you're probably missing like 2-5 questions per LR section. At that point, you just need to continue drilling questions, full sections, and PT's …
-
I read somewhere that LR stimuli are based on confirmed or at least credited studies. It was at that point where I improved greatly on LR. I started to get interested with each stimulus and actually got me engaged with the particular task on hand.
-
Yeah. If you feel burnt out, definitely take a break of at least a whole day. Like @harrismegan , I would get so guilty if I took even half a day off. I get my Feb test score in about a week so I'll let everyone ITT know if pushing through with no m…
-
@harrismegan I guess I forgot a word like "Yeah" or something lol. But it's no big deal. Like I said, I wouldn't get so caught up with the exp thing. It caused me to freak out for a few minutes on my test.
-
Keep on drilling! You've come a long way! How are your BR scores? If over 170, I'd say all you need to do now is to work on timing/confidence mentality/misc stuff.
-
^IMO, that's only one instance of a PT where some experimentals were after the break. I've been following the September and December tests on TLS and the vast majority had their experimental before break. Same happened when I took the Feb one two we…
-
^actually the majority of the time the experimental is in the first 3 sections.
-
How are you currently taking your 4 section PT's?
-
I'd say at least 10 PT scores with a fairly narrow variance range. Also, a good chunk of those PT's in the more modern tests like PT 65+.
-
Career goals? How will you be financing the $? I assume you have a decent gpa if you got into a T25 school but if you study for a retake and score really high 165+, you could be looking at almost a fully scholarship at your regional.
-
I agree with drilling and BR. I wouldn't bother with PT'ing for at least a month. Spend that going through the 7Sage curriculum and drilling the Cambridge packets.
-
Yeah. I thought I would be a bit more anxious on test day but everything went surprisingly well.
-
Not recently but a few days before the actual test, I had a dream about getting a 170. Now I didn't think the test was TOO hard so it's a possibility now. haha
-
IMO, all you need is the Cambridge Packets for LR/LG/RC along with 7Sage. I have experimented with Manhattan LR and the entire Blueprint course.....but what I realized at the end is not all the different curriculums taught by these companies, but ra…
-
IMO, I'd rather use the manhattan forums for the LR explanations and 7sage for LG.
-
I would get the 2nd one from PT 1-38. You really want to use PT 41-60's for full section and PT'ing. Goes the same if you're thinking about purchasing LR drill packets, which I highly recommend as well.
-
IMO, I would do 52-74.
-
Yeah. You'll reach a level where you'll need to diagram lawgic maybe 1-3 times a test. For what it's worth, I took this past Feb test and I think I diagrammed maybe 1 LR question.
-
Get the Cambridge Drilling packets for LR and you'll have access to a bit more. There's 124 MSS questions from PT 1-38.
-
+1 @jdawg113 I highly recommend spending the next month or two going over the 7sage curriculum and drilling the question types. I would avoid taking PT's for now to save them for when you're ready. I made that mistake in burning through a lot fresh…
-
I'm a first time taker. Is it normal to feel like you have absolutely no idea how you did?