For parallel reasoning and parallel flaw it means that you're not adequately grasping the structure of the stimulus. They are perfect examples of how tackling answer choices without a good grasp of the stimulus can be erroneous. I found that the thi…
"G cannot be cleaned until F is cleaned, unless F is cleaned second."
So let's break this down into two sentences. Let's read the first part:
"G cannot be cleaned until F is cleaned." I'll take 'unless' as my logical indicator and keep cannot as t…
I tried to during my final year, it didn't work out for me. I was just going through the process and not really absorbing the material at the level I needed to, just going through the CC as if it was a checklist. I decided to postpone till after gra…
100% not. I generally did 2 or 3 of each type when I first finished it, depending on how many were available, and then moved on to the next section. I made sure to revisit the other problem sets as I progressed through the curriculum because everyth…
It means that you really need to figure out what went wrong for that specific question or maybe even that broader question type. I think this generally shows up for questions that you got wrong timed and on BR, you got right during timed but wrong d…
So at a certain point, revisiting the cc might become repetitive and you may no longer be yielding any results. Is it a trend you spot in br as well or just during timed conditions?
Parallel the flaw type questions, assumption based seemed to be a trend ... br was higher by a few points then timed
Hmm maybe you're struggling with understanding the nature of support? So for example, assumptions generally point out weaknesse…
A little bit of both. I intuitively understand but I make sure to repeat what the premise and conclusion is to myself after I read the stimulus before I go through the answer choices. I think it's realllly important people understand the stimulus be…
I generally watch it after I BR the section or test. Partly because I think we all have to get used to the fact that there's no instant gratification when you take the real test. But also, generally when I've BR-ed a question, I should be ready to l…
If you're really itching to verify your progress, you can always do a timed or untimed section of LR, RC, or LG (or all 3) from PT 1-35. Sure, there might be a couple of recycled material from the CC (so if you remember the answer choice be sure to …
@Nabintou so priority questions are questions you struggled with. Strategy questions are ones where you got an answer choice through process of elimination but you're not sure how/why it works as the right answer choice or its relationship to the st…
Thinking about the nature of support could help. With Must be True types, you're generally supporting the answer choice using the stimulus. Key words in the stem include "logically inferred" aka a valid inference/conclusion.
With PSA, Strengthen, a…
Hey there,
So the last sentence in the stimulus basically says that normal molecular motion sometimes causes rhopsodin molecules to change shape, which introduces error into the system (it's an error because they're changing shape despite not being…
@Cristian-1 just join us when you can! Check the schedule for the week you want to join and make sure you've taken the PT timed and BR-ed it to the best of your abilities before you join.
@Sleepysloth you're added
@"samantha.ashley92" so this thursday is PT 57 and that's followed by PT 63 the following thursday. Since there's limited time, we want people to get a taste of as many different PT's as they can, especially since there are noticeable differences in…
@"samantha.ashley92" sure thing, you're on the list ! Here's the schedule :https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=keets993@gmail.com&ctz=America/Toronto
We do at least one section a week. Sometimes we do a second one for the second LR …