Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
nye8870
About
- Username
- nye8870
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,471
- Last Active
- Roles
- ⭐
Comments
-
If you do not buy a powerball ticket, you will not win the lottery
-
In order to get into law school you MUST study for the LSAT. Or be extremely lucky/unicorn.
-
I believe this to be a straight up Necessary indicator.
-
Contrapositive: "If there is no possibility of home prices rising, then there is no demand for homes."....?
-
Swell example @as5324therapy of the vague logic in the real world. I see this as: "If demand for housing increases, then there is a possibility home prices will rise." Contrapositive: ?
-
I'm 3 episodes along now. This is beyond frustrating.
-
I'd rig the system so billionaires get even richer. *Update* I guess this has already been taken care of.
-
Incidentally, in this PMR question we are looking at a bi-conditional. So either A is the case or B is the case and A&B cannot occur simultaneously. Either a call is placed between 9-5 or a call is placed sometime outside those hours. These are …
-
"Not" isn't in group 4. "Not both" is but rather than a negation it means (either)A .. (or)B ...or (neither). "Not" cuts the world into two halves. Either something "is" or it is "not". In a stimulus, when you are writing out the lawgic, "not" is li…
-
@"Nicole Hopkins" said: Not as old as @nye8870 !! I laughed so hard I think I threw my back out!
-
@"◊ Q.E.D. ◊" said: I would differ with you And perhaps others... "WHAT ARE ASSUMPTIONS? Simply put, they are premises that the author has left out of the argument. That is all assumptions are, period." - JY Ping http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/as…
-
@jaredj229 said: on the LSAT assumptions will never be explicitly stated ....by definition....
-
@shizuokatwin379 said: Am I simply mistaken about the meaning of "deeply meaningful" and what the phrase "lack deeper meaning" implies? I think so. I get your take on the two different phrases but I really think they say the same thing. "Deeply me…
-
@Pacifico said: attend 1L at a school, give up all your credits, drop out, and reapply as a 1L somewhere else. Do 1L+ 1L +1L = JD? I like to bounce around
-
Awesome!
-
Hi there @nicole.hopkins :-) I have a little nugget of an idea I thought might garner some interest. I've seen so many questions regarding speed and plenty of good advice. Perhaps we could facilitate a "training" session to put the advice to practi…
-
@"GSU Hopeful" always gives such sound and generous advice. You are good peeps!
-
@mitrakhanom1 Ok. The reporter wrongly concludes /C --> /M. You can look at the contrapositive which is: If M --> C. Then the flaw becomes quite apparent: the premise is C ---> M but reporter gets it backwards M --> C. Basically the rep…
-
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/clarification-for-the-only/ C ---> M is correct. Check out this lesson...
-
@jennilynn89 Instead of "wasting" the next year....make it the most productive ever! With that amount of time you can make amazing things happen to your LSAT score and in your life as well. Don't worry about the this cycle
-
@Noonec Don't get discouraged. This first try can be used by you in a very meaningful way. You now know exactly how much the test will demand of you (on test day). And you now know if you want to hit 156-160 you should be shooting for an average of …
-
@runiggyrun That is what I figured too but I am not confident in the "density" assumption. I agree that could be the case however I can also drum up scenarios where people live within "central" regardless of total acreage and still cant walk to the…
-
@runiggyrun "The area covered by central Glenwood is approximately the same size as that covered by central Redville." What does -covered- mean. Walking distance or just the square footage attributed to what the town calls -central- ?
-
@"Quick Silver" said: intense thinking I do most of my "in-tents" thinking on camping trips.
-
@"Dillon A. Wright" @"I_am_Batman" said: can I get any cost break? I'm behind in studying due to my mom passing away. My account is going to expire in 3 days. I really like the course thus far.
-
@c.janson35 wow...thx. That is a strange scenario we do not often see. Would you say this is probably something that won't show up in a modern lsat ?
-
@runiggyrun said: The first sentence can be rewritten like this: a. IF inviting, THEN unobtrusive b. IF functional for public use THEN unobtrusive. Does this coincide with this lesson? http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/advanced-andor-in-sufficient-…
-
@runiggyrun said: That leads us to answer B: IF Strong personalities take over THEN buildings are NOT unobtrusive. (and if not unobtrusive, then not functional for public use). I feel like if unobtrusive fails that means that either I or FPU faile…
-
This question has me flummoxed. I mapped this as: (I & FPU) –must-> /O (unobtrusive) Now concerning modern architects they: LSPTOW –producing buildings--> /FPU By negating a sufficient variable as far as I know you do not get to conclude t…
-
@runiggyrun said: Yes, if most A are B AND most A are C, then some B are C would be correct. True....different intersection than OP