Hey there @"Accounts Playable" Let me just address ac(B) and (D). I’ll tell you this though, I got it right sort of by luck and POE but when I watched JYs vid it made perfect sense. (D) states “industrial solutions” should “never” be sought for pro…
@"Accounts Playable" Let me ask you this: What would you pick if this were a Sufficient Assumption question? And then what if ac(A) said just, “Only the best mgt consultants have worked for the top mgt consulting firms.” Wouldn’t this make the argu…
Here is my goofy analogy: The BR score is like a numbers magnet. As long as you continue to do a thorough BR and post a high BR score, then the actual score will make its way up there. With nice 175+ BR scores like you are getting all I would say is…
I'd say: tell your boss you just feel strongly about posting the best score that you are capable of and are uncomfortable going into law school with a sub par score that could haunt you the rest of your life/career. You could tell him that his alma …
This is actually a strengthen question. We are to use a correct answer choice to bolster the argument. In MSS we are using the stimulus to tease out an inference. The stim tells us a general rule: a person who gets sick after eating a meal will ofte…
I think you are exactly right. Morgan acknowledges Brooks will be unhappy if he can't find another job. What he does not factor in is all the things you said (apt, hungry) which would/could lead to a much greater degree of unhappiness. This is reall…
(A) Correct. It does this. Just because Brooks is unhappy with his current job does not mean he won’t become significantly –more- unhappy if he is unemployed.
(B) This ac is basically calling Morg’s argument circular, but it is not. Morg offers a Pr…
"Paper or plastic," you ask? Can I have both? Or perhaps neither? Can I have my groceries put into a box? "Irv, clean up at register 4! Another one of these stressed out LSAT customer's head just blew up."
Nice explanation @"Accounts Playable" ! I would just add this: When the LSAT means for an "or" statement to exclusive, it will appear as "either x or y, but not both" which gets you a logical conversion of x /y. The contrapositive of course is y …
The first sentence regarding XYZ as being a longtime favorite vitamin of food enthusiasts is nothing more than irrelevant context. The last sentence goes ahead and confirms that by stating that the researchers accounted and corrected data to mitigat…
So first of all the stimulus states that we are dealing with an age old argument made by early astronomers: one which we now know to be incorrect. But our job is simply to choose an answer that contains information required for their argument (reaso…
“There are many records of major meteor impacts that do not seem to have been followed by mass extinction.” Logically written:
Major Meteor Impacts – some-> /Followed By Extinction
When we negate, becomes:
Major Meteor Impacts --> Followed By …
You are right.."most" statements cannot be contraposed. But you can contapose ac(E). "The greatest works of art are works that inevitably satisfy all critics." contraposes to /SC --> /GWA. This is exactly the gap filler we need. Granted it is not…
He says the premise's assertion still remains but because the studies did not have enough participants the studies' results are unreliable. I would still stick to the sop of not attacking premise directly.
First of all @"Accounts Playable" , I must state for the record how much I appreciate the tireless and unwavering scrutiny you bring to these tough questions. If it weren’t for LSAT students like you they would probably never admit error and omit q…