Hi there @badgalriri . To address your concern over (D) I can only point out that given the stimulus we do not know what kind of time frame we are talking about. With that in mind it is entirely possible that customers who received the rebate alrea…
Hopefully we are talking about the same question PT2/Section 4/#16 (Weaken). At first read of this “sciency” stimulus, I tried to recall high school chemistry class. Then I imagined the flask inside an airtight chamber.. yadda yadda. But I sort of s…
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/when-to-write-a-non-required-addendum/
Not sure if you can access this but 7Sage has a ton of info/help in this regard.
About 50 million years ago: Bears/Raccoons/Giant Pandas/Red Pandas/Coatis were all one species.
About 30 million years ago: Bears and Raccoons split from one another. (At this point we do not know how or which lineage the Pandas will follow).
20 mil…
It looks to me as if the Meteorologist’s conclusion is that the Sun’s luminosity does not essentially control land temps on Earth. The meteorologist backs this up with a premise (generalization) that – in system as complicated as giving rise to the …
Hi there. I have taken the LSAT twice and can attest to the fact that it is highly unlikely the environment is going to be anywhere near as loud or distracting as you experienced in the library. However, I also would not look at it as a wasted PT. T…
My successful attempt at solving this question was achieved by assigning simple variables to the larger statements. So I said, “If something is A (justifiably regretted if it had not occurred) then that something is B (a thing I should not have desi…
@"Erika " Flashcards are helpful. One side indicator word and the flip side instructions. Also, try http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/basic-translation-group-1-flashcards and http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/basic-translation-group-2-flashcards/ if you…
@odebs2797 Well that sounds like a good reason for sure. Sorry you have endured such pain. Would you happen to know what a school might consider a not-so-good reason?
@jennifer_takyi So ... what is meant by not attacking the premise is to NOT say: "This premise is not true." Instead you say (to the argument) "I accept your premise as true" but, "because of [insert correct answer choice] your premise is not as con…
The stim only has three sentences, which is nice. Even nicer, the first sentence simply defines what the term productivity means. So we are left with only two sentences. A premise and a conclusion. The premise uses “without” so we negate one side an…
I was teetering between (A) & (C) too. The reason I finally chose (C) is because it brings in the fact that the advertisers were aware that they stood to lose money but went ahead and pulled out anyway. This aspect is part of the conclusion: "Th…