LSAT 107 – Section 4 – Question 25
LSAT 107 - Section 4 - Question 25
October 1999You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 0:49
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
| Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT107 S4 Q25 |
+LR
| Flaw or descriptive weakening +Flaw Rule-Application +RuleApp Value Judgment +ValJudg Analogy +An | A
3%
159
B
1%
157
C
5%
157
D
3%
158
E
87%
166
|
140 149 157 |
+Medium | 141.321 +SubsectionEasier |
J.Y.’s explanation
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
A
cites examples that are insufficient to support the generalization that performance evaluations in the professional world are conducted in realistic situations
The strength of the author’s examples is irrelevant. We’re focusing on whether the author’s reasoning for arguing that students should have access to textbooks during exams is sound.
B
fails to consider the possibility that adopting its recommendation will not significantly increase most students’ test scores
The effect the author’s recommendation would have on test scores is irrelevant to whether the reasoning in the author’s argument is sound.
C
neglects to take into account the fact that professionals were once students who also did not have access to textbooks during examinations
We don’t know if the author took this into account, but regardless, the fact that professionals were once students has no bearing on the strength of the author’s argument that students should have access to textbooks during exams.
D
neglects to take into account the fact that, unlike students, professionals have devoted many years of study to one subject
We don’t know if the author took this into account, but regardless, the fact that professionals have devoted years to studying one subject has no bearing on the soundness of the author’s reasoning.
E
fails to consider the possibility that the purposes of evaluation in the professional world and in school situations are quite dissimilar
This describes a possibility that the author ignores. If the purposes of evaluation in the professional world differ from those in school, it may be well-reasoned that students aren’t allowed access to textbooks even though professionals have access to reference materials.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 107 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 2 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.