LSAT 110 – Section 2 – Question 23
LSAT 110 - Section 2 - Question 23
June 2001You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:55
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
| Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT110 S2 Q23 |
+LR
| Must be true +MBT Conditional Reasoning +CondR | A
8%
161
B
11%
162
C
11%
162
D
2%
158
E
68%
169
|
152 160 168 |
+Hardest | 145.606 +SubsectionMedium |
J.Y.’s explanation
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Summary
If monster is horrific, it’s threatening.
If monster is physically dangerous, it’s threatening.
If monster inspires revulsion, it’s horrific.
If monster is physically dangerous, it’s threatening.
If monster inspires revulsion, it’s horrific.
Notable Valid Inferences
If a monster inspires revulsion, then it’s threatening.
A
Any horror-story monster that is threatening is also horrific.
Could be false. We know that all monsters that are horrific are threatening. This doesn’t mean every monster that’s threatening is horrific. There can be threatening monsters that aren’t horrific (maybe they’re threatening for some other reason).
B
A monster that is psychologically dangerous, but that does not inspire revulsion, is not horrific.
Could be false. We know that monsters that inspire revulsion are horrific. That doesn’t imply monsters that don’t inspire revulsion are not horrific. They can still be horrific for other reasons besides revulsion.
C
If a monster triggers infantile fears but is not physically dangerous, then it is not horrific.
Could be false. We know that physically dangerous monsters are threatening. We also know that horrific monsters are threatening. This doesn’t imply that monsters that aren’t physically dangerous aren’t horrific. A monster can be horrific without being physically dangerous.
D
If a monster is both horrific and psychologically threatening, then it does not inspire revulsion.
Could be false. We know that monsters that inspire revulsion are horrific. This doesn’t imply that monsters that are horrific don’t inspire revulsion. It’s possible every monster that’s horrific and threatening inspires revulsion.
E
All monsters that are not physically dangerous, but that are psychologically dangerous and inspire revulsion, are threatening.
Must be true. The stimulus tells us that all monsters that inspire revulsion are horrific, and all monsters that are horrific are threatening. So, all monsters that inspire revulsion are threatening.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 110 Explanations
Section 1 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.