LSAT 112 – Section 3 – Question 21

LSAT 112 - Section 3 - Question 21

December 2001

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Ask a tutor

Target time: 1:22

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT112 S3 Q21
+LR
Flaw or descriptive weakening +Flaw
Math +Math
A
3%
154
B
53%
161
C
22%
159
D
4%
154
E
18%
155
141
158
175
 +Harder 144.548 +SubsectionEasier

Sandy: I play the Bigbucks lottery—that’s the one where you pick five numbers and all the players who have picked the five numbers drawn at the end of the week share the money pot. But it’s best to play only after there have been a few weeks with no winners, because the money pot increases each week that there is no winner.

Alex: No, you’re more likely to win the lottery when the money pot is small, because that’s when the fewest other people are playing.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
Alex implicitly concludes that Sandy should not play the Bigbucks lottery when the pot is larger. He supports this by saying Sandy is more likely to win when the pot is small, since that’s when the fewest people are playing.

Identify and Describe Flaw
Alex’s reasoning is mistaken because he doesn’t understand how the Bigbucks lottery works. To play, Sandy picks five numbers, and if they match the winning numbers, she shares the prize with anyone else who also picks correctly.

Alex thinks Sandy is more likely to win when fewer people play, but that’s not true. Her chance of picking the correct five numbers doesn't depend on how many other people are playing. The number of other players may affect how many people she’d have to split the pot with, but it doesn’t affect her individual chance of winning.

A
Sandy holds that the chances of anyone’s winning are unaffected by the number of times that person plays.
Like (C), Sandy never makes any claims about the chances of winning, nor does she claim that her chance of winning is unaffected by the number of times she plays. She just argues that it’s best to play when there’s a bigger pot.
B
Alex holds that the chances of Sandy’s winning are affected by the number of other people playing.
This describes a mistake in Alex’s reasoning. He thinks that Sandy is more likely to win when fewer people play. But actually, her chances of picking the correct five numbers are the same— extremely low— regardless of how many other players there are.
C
Sandy holds that the chances of anyone’s winning are unaffected by the size of the pot.
Like (A), Sandy never makes any claims about the chances of winning. Also, it’s true that the chances of anyone’s winning are unaffected by the size of the pot. So even if she did hold this, it wouldn’t be a mistake in her reasoning.
D
Alex holds that the chances of Sandy’s winning in a given week are unaffected by whether anyone has won the week before.
Alex never makes this claim. But even if he did, it wouldn’t describe a mistake in his reasoning because it’s true that Sandy’s chances of winning in a given week are unaffected by whether someone won the week before.
E
Sandy holds that the chances of there being a winner go up if no one has won the lottery for quite a while.
Sandy never claims that the chance of there being a winner goes up if no one has won in a while. She just argues that it’s best to play after no one has won in a while, because that’s when the pot is biggest.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 112 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Reading Comprehension

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply