LSAT 105 – Section 2 – Question 08
LSAT 105 - Section 2 - Question 08
February 1999You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:01
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT105 S2 Q08 |
+LR
+Exp
| Method of reasoning or descriptive +Method | A
8%
159
B
82%
166
C
9%
158
D
0%
153
E
1%
156
|
130 144 158 |
+Medium | 145.978 +SubsectionMedium |
Summarize Argument
The author concludes that every mother bat is able to recognize the call of her pup. As evidence, the author states that a bat’s calls are the only means of finding one another, and that a bat pup cannot distinguish calls between adult bats.
Describe Method of Reasoning
The author concludes that a mother bat must be able to recognize the call of her pup by eliminating the possibility of a bat pup recognizing the call of a mother bat.
A
derive a general conclusion about all members of a group from facts known about representative members of that group
The author does not provide facts about representative members of a group. While the author’s conclusion is a general conclusion applying to all mother bats, the author’s premises do not include facts about a specific set of mother bats.
B
establish the validity of one explanation for a phenomenon by excluding alternative explanations
The alternative explanation the author excludes is the possibility of a bat pup recognizing its mother’s call. Since this is not a possibility, the author concludes that the other possibility of a mother bat recognizing its pup’s call is a valid explanation.
C
support, by describing a suitable mechanism, the hypothesis that a certain phenomenon can occur
The author does not describe how mother bats are able to recognize a pup’s call. Rather, the author states this phenomenon as a matter of fact.
D
conclude that members of two groups are likely to share a certain ability because of other characteristics they share
The author only addresses and comes to a conclusion about one group of animals. The author does not make comparisons between bats and any other animal.
E
demonstrate that a general rule applies in a particular case
The author does not provide a particular case that illustrates the conclusion. Rather, the author’s argument is stated generally and theoretically.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 105 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 3 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.