LSAT 105 – Section 4 – Question 21

LSAT 105 - Section 4 - Question 21

February 1999

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Ask a tutor

Target time: 2:13

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT105 S4 Q21
+LR
Must be false +MBF
A
8%
165
B
8%
162
C
61%
169
D
12%
160
E
11%
160
153
162
170
 +Hardest 144.839 +SubsectionEasier

Ethicist: A person who treats others well is more worthy of praise if this treatment is at least partially motivated by feelings of compassion than if it is entirely motivated by cold and dispassionate concern for moral obligation. This is so despite the fact that a person can choose to do what is morally right but cannot choose to have feelings.

Summary

Who is more worthy of praise? A person who treats others well partially out of feelings of compassion, or a person who treats others well entirely out of of moral obligation? The person motivated by feelings is more worthy of praise.

People can choose to do what is morally right.

People cannot choose to have feelings.

Notable Valid Inferences

People can be more worthy of praise even when they are motivated by something they cannot control than when they are motivated by something that they can control.

A
Only actions that are at least partially the result of a person’s feelings should be used in measuring the praiseworthiness of that person.

Could be true. The author believes a person motivated by compassion is more worthy of praise. So he could believe that only actions resulting from feelings should be used in determining praiseworthiness.

B
If a person feels compassion toward the people affected by that person’s actions, yet these actions diminish the welfare of those people, that person does not deserve praise.

Could be true. The stimulus only tells us about who is more or less deserving of praise. This is a relative relationship. We do not know who does or does not deserve praise.

C
Only what is subject to a person’s choice should be used in measuring the praiseworthiness of that person.

Must be false. We know a person who’s motivated by feelings, which we can’t control, is more worthy of praise than a person who’s motivated by obligation, which we can control. So the author disagrees with the idea that praiseworthiness depends only on stuff we can choose.

D
Someone who acts without feelings of compassion toward those affected by the actions is worthy of praise if those actions enhance the welfare of the people affected.

Could be true. The stimulus only tells us about who is more or less deserving of praise. This is a relative relationship. We do not know who is or is not worthy of praise.

E
If someone wants to have compassion toward others but does not, that person is worthy of praise.

Could be true. The stimulus only tells us about who is more or less deserving of praise. This is a relative relationship. We do not know who is or is not worthy of praise.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 105 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Reading Comprehension

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply